EntryStandard

Contact / Pilot

Start with a Mock No-Access File Audit

Not ready for deployment? Test whether your current no-access files can be produced. If your current records are solid, the audit says so. If they are scattered, the audit shows what can and cannot be reconstructed.

EntryStandard is deployed through a structured pilot review, not self-serve signup. A pilot review establishes the program's regulatory overlay, its outreach plan, and the record requirements before any system is configured.

If you only read one thing: start with up to 15 sample properties. We test whether your current no-access files can be produced. If they are solid, the memo says so.

Who a pilot is for

  • Municipalities and water systems planning or running an LSLR program with customer-side replacement obligations.
  • Engineering firms administering such programs and responsible for the documentation that survives them.

What a pilot review covers

  • The applicable reasonable-effort requirement: the documented effort to obtain owner consent — at least four attempts by at least two methods (40 CFR §141.84(d)(3)(i)) — plus the state overlay for your program.
  • Your current outreach record — what exists, what is reconstructible, what is not.
  • Deployment scope: properties, languages, instrument requirements (notarization, recordability, grantee chain), and export obligations.

Watch the 3-minute walkthrough — a narrated tour of the synthetic Alder Run program: worklist, non-responsive drilldown, record-source labels, verification, and the ProofPack export. The demonstration shows record structure and verification; it is not legal advice or a compliance opinion.

The structured pilot review includes a working demonstration of the program console and homeowner flow against a synthetic program.

Start with a bounded review, not a platform commitment

Mock No-Access File Audit — $9,500 flat fee

Up to 15 sample properties from one active or recently completed LSLR phase — a review of the program's existing right-of-entry, refusal, non-response, and outreach records. Deliverables: a written gap memo, an access-risk scorecard, a findings CSV, and a sample ProofPack built from the program's own record types. The fee is credited toward a production pilot signed within 90 days. Larger sample sets or multi-phase reviews are quoted before work begins. If your current records are solid, the memo says so. (one-page scope, PDF)

No-Access File Closeout Review — from $12,500

For larger active or recently completed phase reviews: the same artifacts, framed for closeout — can each no-access file be reconstructed and packaged before the phase closes, including the material submitted annually to the state?

Structured Pilot Review — $15,000 flat fee, credited toward a production pilot

Deliverables: the program's regulatory overlay map (federal floor plus state requirements), current-record assessment, ROE/refusal workflow definition, instrument requirements, export obligations, pilot scope, and bid/spec language.

Production Pilot — from $35,000

Usually 250–500 properties. A limited deployment for one program phase: one ROE/refusal workflow, one export package. No system replacement, no GIS migration, no change to construction management. Pilot data can be exchanged by CSV/export unless a deeper integration is scoped. Communications and mailing costs are pass-through.

Pilot integration is intentionally narrow. Most pilots begin with a worklist export and return status fields plus ProofPacks; API or vendor-specific integration is scoped only after the access workflow proves useful. See How It Fits.

Program Deployment — scoped after pilot

Program fee plus per-property record fee.

The Mock No-Access File Audit and Structured Pilot Review are flat-fee engagements sized to fall within typical small-purchase authority. Procurement thresholds and approval paths vary by program; the flat-fee engagements are designed to be easy to scope, approve, and credit toward a pilot. The question they answer is the one that matters: what would it cost to reconstruct a defensible file later?

Reaching us

Write to compliance@entrystandard.org with the program name, the water system or firm, where the program stands (planning, funded, in outreach, in construction), and how access records are kept today — paper, spreadsheets, Survey123, DocuSign, LeadCAST, 120Water, or another workflow. We respond to program inquiries in order of compliance deadline.

This site sets no cookies, runs no analytics, and stores no form submissions. The mailto link above opens your own mail client; nothing is collected here.